Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 9th Feb 2011 00:04 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 461659
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Non-touchscreen phones should be considered as low-end phones. For that kind of phones and the "Touch & Type" series, juste use Serie 40. Nothing else.
Why would people who don't like touchscreens only get low-end phones ?
Besides, that's the approach which all other phone manufacturers currently follow. Should Nokia follow it too, they'd become just another phone manufacturer which makes the same product as every other. Not being able to compete on merit, they'd have to compete on cost. And the cost battle is a very tricky one, especially when you've pissed off a part of your user base by beginning it and are not known for the quality of your products in the area where you try to compete.
Edited 2011-02-09 16:36 UTC




Member since:
2008-08-07
Non-touchscreen phones should be considered as low-end phones. For that kind of phones and the "Touch & Type" series, juste use Serie 40. Nothing else.