Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 11th Feb 2011 11:35 UTC
PDAs, Cellphones, Wireless A lot of people are wondering why Nokia didn't choose to go with Android. How can Nokia differentiate themselves when Android is a lot more open and free than Windows Phone 7? As usual, the key to this is in the details. If you read the announcements carefully, you'll see that Microsoft offered Nokia something Google most likely didn't. Update: What a surprise. Elop just confirmed Nokia has a special deal with Microsoft. Whereas HTC, Samsung, and so on are not allowed to customise WP7 - Nokia is, further confirming my theory.
Thread beginning with comment 461990
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Summing this up
by _xmv on Fri 11th Feb 2011 12:52 UTC in reply to "RE: Summing this up"
Member since:

And why would MS allow them to port Qt?
Which also shows how much "influence" Nokia is going to get over direction of WP7.

I did not say MS would want to do it. Do not put words in people's mouth.. or hand, in the Internet case.

I said Nokia should have had this part of the deal, for it to be an OK deal.

This is Nokia's own fault here. If they cannot due to Microsoft, then it makes the alliance a bad move for developers, both code wise and trust wise. But especially trust wise I guess.


Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[3]: Summing this up
by qbast on Fri 11th Feb 2011 12:59 in reply to "RE[2]: Summing this up"
qbast Member since:

And also shows from the beginning who is the boss in this alliance.

Reply Parent Score: 1