Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 11th Feb 2011 11:35 UTC
PDAs, Cellphones, Wireless A lot of people are wondering why Nokia didn't choose to go with Android. How can Nokia differentiate themselves when Android is a lot more open and free than Windows Phone 7? As usual, the key to this is in the details. If you read the announcements carefully, you'll see that Microsoft offered Nokia something Google most likely didn't. Update: What a surprise. Elop just confirmed Nokia has a special deal with Microsoft. Whereas HTC, Samsung, and so on are not allowed to customise WP7 - Nokia is, further confirming my theory.
Thread beginning with comment 462031
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Hum ...
by Thom_Holwerda on Fri 11th Feb 2011 14:30 UTC in reply to "Hum ..."
Thom_Holwerda
Member since:
2005-06-29

The '90s called, they want your paranoia back.

You're looking at this as if Microsoft is a monopoly in the mobile phone world. They're anything but. The NEED Nokia to be successful.

Reply Parent Score: -3

RE[2]: Hum ...
by Radio on Fri 11th Feb 2011 14:34 in reply to "RE: Hum ..."
Radio Member since:
2009-06-20

The '90s called, they want your paranoia back.

The XXIst century called, they don't want your Zune and Kin.

Reply Parent Score: 4

RE[2]: Hum ...
by acobar on Fri 11th Feb 2011 14:38 in reply to "RE: Hum ..."
acobar Member since:
2005-11-15

And they were nothing on Client/Server, as they were nothing on 3D expertise, as they were nothing on Server infra-structure. But used very well the "underdog" image and turned the table. They looked for the right things: expertize, inter-communication and association to be viewed as a trustful and capable player. Once they got what they wanted ..., it is history now.

Edited 2011-02-11 14:40 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[2]: Hum ...
by segedunum on Fri 11th Feb 2011 17:17 in reply to "RE: Hum ..."
segedunum Member since:
2005-07-06

The '90s called, they want your paranoia back.

Actually, the 80s called. They tell us that those who don't learn from history are doomed to repeat it.

The NEED Nokia to be successful.

No they don't. They're going to get Windows on to a lot of phones and they've got a cushy little number, because they control the platform. If Nokia goes bust they'll move on to something else. Nokia is taking all the risk here.

Edited 2011-02-11 17:17 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 4

RE[2]: Hum ...
by Soulbender on Sat 12th Feb 2011 15:03 in reply to "RE: Hum ..."
Soulbender Member since:
2005-08-18

Yes, this deal is much better for Microsoft than for Nokia, just as the deals the OP listed.
Soon Samsung et al are going to go to their sales rep and tell him "wtf dude, why do Nokia get this special treatment? Why arent we allowed to do what they're doing? Get your shit together or we'll move to something else."
After this one of two things will happen. MS will either let all Win7 OEM's do what Nokia does (contracts arent forever, ay know) or the other OEM's will jump ship for something else.
Guess what's Microsoft's preferred option and guess how that will work out for Nokia...

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[3]: Hum ...
by MollyC on Sat 12th Feb 2011 15:28 in reply to "RE[2]: Hum ..."
MollyC Member since:
2006-07-04

Those other companies are already putting 90% of their effort into Android anyway, so who cares? And that's why Nokia gets the special treatment - they, unlike the others, are going all in with WP7.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[2]: Hum ...
by bert64 on Sat 12th Feb 2011 17:03 in reply to "RE: Hum ..."
bert64 Member since:
2007-04-23

They needed IBM too...
When they no longer need Nokia, then Nokia will be dropped and screwed. MS has a long history of screwing their "partners" and they have done nothing to suggest that this behaviour is going to end.

Reply Parent Score: 2