To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
And they were nothing on Client/Server, as they were nothing on 3D expertise, as they were nothing on Server infra-structure. But used very well the "underdog" image and turned the table. They looked for the right things: expertize, inter-communication and association to be viewed as a trustful and capable player. Once they got what they wanted ..., it is history now.
Edited 2011-02-11 14:40 UTC
Actually, the 80s called. They tell us that those who don't learn from history are doomed to repeat it.
No they don't. They're going to get Windows on to a lot of phones and they've got a cushy little number, because they control the platform. If Nokia goes bust they'll move on to something else. Nokia is taking all the risk here.
Edited 2011-02-11 17:17 UTC
Yes, this deal is much better for Microsoft than for Nokia, just as the deals the OP listed.
Soon Samsung et al are going to go to their sales rep and tell him "wtf dude, why do Nokia get this special treatment? Why arent we allowed to do what they're doing? Get your shit together or we'll move to something else."
After this one of two things will happen. MS will either let all Win7 OEM's do what Nokia does (contracts arent forever, ay know) or the other OEM's will jump ship for something else.
Guess what's Microsoft's preferred option and guess how that will work out for Nokia...




Member since:
2005-06-29
The '90s called, they want your paranoia back.
You're looking at this as if Microsoft is a monopoly in the mobile phone world. They're anything but. The NEED Nokia to be successful.