Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 11th Feb 2011 11:35 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 462175
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Qt fans should be upset with Nokia, not Microsoft
by nt_jerkface on Fri 11th Feb 2011 22:06
in reply to "RE: Qt fans should be upset with Nokia, not Microsoft"
That's a good point.
Going with the mini Linux distro approach has caused a lot more problems for companies than the modified kernel as a base for a new OS approach.
The problem is definitely not the Linux kernel. It's well established that even unmodified it can be relied upon for embedded use.
Linux is very portable but it seems that a lot of what goes into a distro is not. The mini Linux distro approach has been a tar baby for companies like Nokia. They think they are saving time but run into unforeseen interdependencies.
RE[2]: Qt fans should be upset with Nokia, not Microsoft
by Radio on Fri 11th Feb 2011 23:37
in reply to "RE: Qt fans should be upset with Nokia, not Microsoft"




Member since:
2005-09-01
Maybe there's something fundamentally wrong with that linux distro inspired development model. I've seen to many companies that announce linux revolutionary products in mobile to eventually come up with nothing but burned milions.
On the other hand Google and HP are basically using heavily customized linux kernel as a HAL slapping own user space over it. Quite pragmatic choice.
For one they are strongly discouraging end devs from accessing the native system layer.
I think nothing stops the two from dumping linux in the long term (the Alien software seems like a prove to that).