Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 11th Feb 2011 11:35 UTC
PDAs, Cellphones, Wireless A lot of people are wondering why Nokia didn't choose to go with Android. How can Nokia differentiate themselves when Android is a lot more open and free than Windows Phone 7? As usual, the key to this is in the details. If you read the announcements carefully, you'll see that Microsoft offered Nokia something Google most likely didn't. Update: What a surprise. Elop just confirmed Nokia has a special deal with Microsoft. Whereas HTC, Samsung, and so on are not allowed to customise WP7 - Nokia is, further confirming my theory.
Thread beginning with comment 462423
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Long-time Nokia user here
by _txf_ on Mon 14th Feb 2011 14:41 UTC in reply to "Long-time Nokia user here"
_txf_
Member since:
2008-03-17

Unfortunately moving to non-symbian devices involves moving to considerably more expensive and powerful devices to do the same functions.

That is unless you go for a cheapo low end android device whereupon you'll suffer from a bad user experience as android stretches the devices limits.

Windows phone has the same requirements as the average higher end android device so you don't win much by going to either.

Reply Parent Score: 2

Johann Chua Member since:
2005-07-22

Here's to hoping Nokia still works on improving Symbian, then. I do like having a phone that lasts a few days between charges. My current phone is probably good for another year or two at the very least, though it would be nice if it had 3G.

Reply Parent Score: 2

_txf_ Member since:
2008-03-17

Here's to hoping Nokia still works on improving Symbian.


Hahahahahaha. Even lately when they were improving it they had very little to show for it, that is even more unlikely now.

But I do know what you mean. All my symbian phones last forever and do a lot with their anemic processors in comparison to my android beast.

Reply Parent Score: 2