Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 11th Feb 2011 11:35 UTC
PDAs, Cellphones, Wireless A lot of people are wondering why Nokia didn't choose to go with Android. How can Nokia differentiate themselves when Android is a lot more open and free than Windows Phone 7? As usual, the key to this is in the details. If you read the announcements carefully, you'll see that Microsoft offered Nokia something Google most likely didn't. Update: What a surprise. Elop just confirmed Nokia has a special deal with Microsoft. Whereas HTC, Samsung, and so on are not allowed to customise WP7 - Nokia is, further confirming my theory.
Thread beginning with comment 462424
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Long-time Nokia user here
by Johann Chua on Mon 14th Feb 2011 15:05 UTC in reply to "RE: Long-time Nokia user here"
Johann Chua
Member since:

Here's to hoping Nokia still works on improving Symbian, then. I do like having a phone that lasts a few days between charges. My current phone is probably good for another year or two at the very least, though it would be nice if it had 3G.

Reply Parent Score: 2

_txf_ Member since:

Here's to hoping Nokia still works on improving Symbian.

Hahahahahaha. Even lately when they were improving it they had very little to show for it, that is even more unlikely now.

But I do know what you mean. All my symbian phones last forever and do a lot with their anemic processors in comparison to my android beast.

Reply Parent Score: 2

Neolander Member since:

Well, I'm currently collecting data for an article about another, much less known project which aims at targeting the mid-end phone market : Samsung's bada.

Sounds like an interesting platform so far. It's still in its infancy as compared to Symbian, but it's impressive how much they have achieved already. Could be a nice successor to Symbian, although there are some things which bug me about it... More on that in the article.

Edited 2011-02-15 09:14 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 1