Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 16th Feb 2011 23:02 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 462853
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Might be the other way round
by daedliusswartz on Thu 17th Feb 2011 10:43
in reply to "Might be the other way round"
RE[2]: Might be the other way round
by ichi on Thu 17th Feb 2011 10:51
in reply to "RE: Might be the other way round"
RE[2]: Might be the other way round
by segedunum on Thu 17th Feb 2011 14:10
in reply to "RE: Might be the other way round"
RE: Might be the other way round
by unclefester on Thu 17th Feb 2011 11:17
in reply to "Might be the other way round"
RE[2]: Might be the other way round
by Lennie on Thu 17th Feb 2011 12:19
in reply to "RE: Might be the other way round"
RE[2]: Might be the other way round
by nt_jerkface on Thu 17th Feb 2011 17:49
in reply to "RE: Might be the other way round"




Member since:
2010-01-05
It might be the case that the Nokia board brought Elop in with the specific objective of moving them to Microsoft's OS platform. If this is the case then there's no conflict of interest.