Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 16th Feb 2011 23:02 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 462898
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I've been through .Net and Visual Studio for web applications, and God, is it tedious. That's why we all moved to Ruby and Rails where I work.
I couldn't agree more actually. ASP.Net Forms, which is what I assume you are referring to, was just a major blunder from MS. Trying to make a desktop development model work over http, with the ugly hack that view state is, was a seriously bad idea.
MVC however is what the MS web kids are using these days and it is sooooooo much better.
I've been through .Net and Visual Studio for web applications, and God, is it tedious. That's why we all moved to Ruby and Rails where I work.
The most tedious part of any .Net application is the deployment though. It's bloody awful.
The most tedious part of any .Net application is the deployment though. It's bloody awful.
With a ASP.NET Website you just upload the files ... and they are recompiled on the fly ... are you serious?
I never needed to deploy more than a couple of versions of a ASP.NET webapp but I googled it ...
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/f735abw9.aspx
Oh ... a few lines of in the command prompt ... fuck me must be mind bending.




Member since:
2005-07-06
I've been through .Net and Visual Studio for web applications, and God, is it tedious. That's why we all moved to Ruby and Rails where I work.
The most tedious part of any .Net application is the deployment though. It's bloody awful.