Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 16th Feb 2011 23:02 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 462923
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/16/13 9:29 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2011-01-28
According to Ars there is still some way to go: http://arstechnica.com/open-source/news/2011/02/hands-on-with-intel...
But why shouldn't they choose the easy way when their platform is burning
I have to admit though, that my knowledge of MeeGo is quite limited, so I may be mistaken about its readiness. Also if Intel keeps backing it then it may still have a future.
But now they are at the mercy of MS. Not only is the development environment completely closed, but they also have to pay to have access to the OS.
True, but MS has also, in all its years, done one thing consistently right. It has stuck by its developers and the companies producing hardware for its platform. I don't think Nokia is in danger of being screwed by MS. MS is tough when it comes to competitors, but Nokia isn't a competitor.
My biggest current concern is the lack of side loading for applications. The iPhone has shown that people will not put up with this, so I fail to understand why MS chose the same route. I hope the "promises" they made related to the WP7 Chevron thing holds true, otherwise I'll probably get an Android next time.