Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 27th Feb 2011 20:26 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 464325
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-07-25
I agree 100% with your comment on the hfs+ file system. It's the weakest point in macosx. I've suffered two data corruption situations in which the file system become corrupted and the data was lost. Nothing wrong with the hardware it was the file system which had given up the ghost. This is where I find one of Windows strong points, NTFS is incredibly resilient and I've yet to see a whole disk go bad through the fault of NTFS, even with bad sectiors NTFS performs well. I really hope that as you have commented apple either purchases/licence a new Filesystem, as hfs+ just cannot keep up and it's not something I like worrying about when storing large amounts of data on a hfs+ drive.