Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 3rd Mar 2011 20:22 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 464921
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: I don't mean to chime in slightly of topic...
by vodoomoth on Mon 7th Mar 2011 13:02
in reply to "RE[4]: I don't mean to chime in slightly of topic..."
I can confidently say that your argument does not support your conclusion.
That's probably because his arguments were not meant to support the conclusion but it's really the other way around.
He was debunking the faulty "it is event-driven but it has no even loop" that the parent poster was putting out. Actually, @dizzey was providing a counter-example to what @bloodline said in "iOS is event driven. All your code is executed by event handling methods, there isn't an event loop that waits for an event."




Member since:
2005-12-21
they want the mindset of event driven programming but the system is not built like that from the ground up.
I'm not sure what your point is here. If you are implying that that qt/gtk have per-thread event loops (they don't necessarily, but they can) and that iOS/CocoaTouch does not (ditto) you are wrong. Being event-driven is not the differentiating factor over whether your system multitasks or not.
Having used all three toolkits extensively, I can confidently say that your argument does not support your conclusion.