Linked by Hadrien Grasland on Sun 6th Mar 2011 12:45 UTC, submitted by Petur
Ubuntu, Kubuntu, Xubuntu "In this post I show step-by-step how you can setup your own "Super computer cluster" using Ubuntu MPI Cluster from multiple machines with the goal of bruteforcing strong encrypted passwords with John the Ripper for academic purposes. Owners of quad core machines will also benefit from this setup as the "john" binaries found in the Ubuntu Repositories are compiled to run on only one core. I managed to decrease the time required to crack password hashes using this setup."
Thread beginning with comment 464925
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Comment by Laurence
by Soulbender on Sun 6th Mar 2011 22:34 UTC in reply to "Comment by Laurence"
Soulbender
Member since:
2005-08-18

Is this true?

On the server? probably not.

I honestly thought that most Linux servers ran CentOS or OpenSuse


Boy, dont even get me started on too-cheap-to-pay-for-RHEL and OpenSUSE. CentOS is getting seriously long in the tooth and SUSe is just, eh, meh.
Ubuntu Server kicks their asses by not being bloated with a gazillion things in the default install and by being generally leaner. No fricken Yast, thank God.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[2]: Comment by Laurence
by Laurence on Sun 6th Mar 2011 22:50 in reply to "RE: Comment by Laurence"
Laurence Member since:
2007-03-26


Boy, dont even get me started on too-cheap-to-pay-for-RHEL and OpenSUSE. CentOS is getting seriously long in the tooth and SUSe is just, eh, meh.
Ubuntu Server kicks their asses by not being bloated with a gazillion things in the default install and by being generally leaner.

Nobody uses a default install on servers anyway. I mean who wants XWindows on a headless system, for example?
The nice thing about CentOS (and OpenSUSE IIRC) was how easy it was to just do a minimal server install. In fact I have a CentOS webserver running on 256MB RAM right now and that only took my a few mins to set up, yet it's been lean enough to manage 2 virtual hosts - albeit neither with heavy traffic.
No fricken Yast, thank God.

I hear people moan about Yast constantly but I can't say I ever had a problem with it. Granted it has it's short comings but nobody is forced into using it (you can configure the system the old fashioned way in vi / nano if you want) and and Yast actually quite good for some some jobs.


I know it's all horses for courses though (I'm running CentOS, ArchLinux and FreeBSD servers) so I was just polling to see what others use / thought

Edited 2011-03-06 22:54 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[3]: Comment by Laurence
by Soulbender on Sun 6th Mar 2011 23:15 in reply to "RE[2]: Comment by Laurence"
Soulbender Member since:
2005-08-18

The nice thing about CentOS (and OpenSUSE IIRC) was how easy it was to just do a minimal server install.


Well, my point was that it's even easier with Ubuntu Server. It's entirely barebones *by default* and you don't get any additional stuff unless you chose to install it. Other than Slackware it's probably the most BSD-ish of Linux distros.
You should give it a try.

I hear people moan about Yast constantly but I can't say I ever had a problem with it.


I'm just a sucker for simplicity and vi, I guess. Plus Yast becomes obsolete as soon as you start doing serious configuration management.

Reply Parent Score: 2