Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 7th Mar 2011 15:50 UTC, submitted by Geoff Floding
Thread beginning with comment 465074
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: The commercial variant is required
by Nth_Man on Mon 7th Mar 2011 18:35
in reply to "RE: The commercial variant is required"
> > The commercial variant is required for some niches
> > of the market
> IANAL, but I think that one of the biggest stumbling
> blocks in using the LGPL in these industries is
> actually the lack of warranty protection in sections
> 15 and 16.
Let's notice that the discussion was about if the commercial variant was required. That "commercial" license does not give a "warranty protection", so that "commercial" license it's not required (talking about the "warranty" factor).
Those clauses are simply not acceptable in those industries (and others).
We would like to know what software library gives you what Qt gives you... and also gives you "warranty protection". If you find no one, it's normal :-(




Member since:
2005-09-21
IANAL, but I think that one of the biggest stumbling blocks in using the LGPL in these industries is actually the lack of warranty protection in sections 15 and 16. Those clauses are simply not acceptable in those industries (and others).