Linked by snydeq on Tue 8th Mar 2011 23:54 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 465418
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
OP doesn't talk about gui vs. non-gui, he's talking about Unix being a really elegant way of designing a system by not overdesigning it. In Windows, settings reside in the registry, INI files, binary configuration files and are scattered about the filesystem without any sense of organizational structure.
The Unix *culture* on the other hand is that of building on top of existing infrastructure. Unix has a fairly well designed and simple file system, so you just put conffiles in /etc, just like everybody else does. Of course there's the odd misfit who doesn't play nice, instead scattering their crap around in /opt/vendor/package or /usr/package - those are then ridiculed in the Unix culture, rather than glorified.





Member since:
2007-11-23
This is so true. I inherited a WS 2003 install a year or two ago.
It is so frustrating wasting time trying to find the right GUI screen on WS, it's tedious in the extreme when you have an idea what you are doing. It constantly winds me up.
I've gradually migrated services away from the box with a view to decommisioning but I fear I may never be rid of it, I dread the idea of trying to shift years worth of shared folders and user setup.