Linked by snydeq on Tue 8th Mar 2011 23:54 UTC
Windows Grizzled Unix vet Paul Venezia tips his cap to the Windows Server crew, suggesting that the lessons of Unix history have not been lost on Microsoft -- and that's one reason why Windows Server has become so complex. 'The Windows Server of today has more in common with Unix than many people want to admit. The upside: more stable servers, greater scope of services, better adherence to standards, and Microsoft's newfound willingness to work with its competition. The downside is that Windows has become more complex than Unix from a management and administration point of view,' Venezia writes, even if he still sees some Windows admin practices as prime examples of how not to administer servers.
Thread beginning with comment 465418
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: digging
by Zaitch on Wed 9th Mar 2011 10:27 UTC in reply to "digging"
Zaitch
Member since:
2007-11-23

This is so true. I inherited a WS 2003 install a year or two ago.

It is so frustrating wasting time trying to find the right GUI screen on WS, it's tedious in the extreme when you have an idea what you are doing. It constantly winds me up.

I've gradually migrated services away from the box with a view to decommisioning but I fear I may never be rid of it, I dread the idea of trying to shift years worth of shared folders and user setup.

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[2]: digging
by Thom_Holwerda on Wed 9th Mar 2011 11:06 in reply to "RE: digging"
Thom_Holwerda Member since:
2005-06-29

You could get Server 2008 and run without a GUI at all.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[3]: digging
by saso on Wed 9th Mar 2011 12:15 in reply to "RE[2]: digging"
saso Member since:
2007-04-18

OP doesn't talk about gui vs. non-gui, he's talking about Unix being a really elegant way of designing a system by not overdesigning it. In Windows, settings reside in the registry, INI files, binary configuration files and are scattered about the filesystem without any sense of organizational structure.

The Unix *culture* on the other hand is that of building on top of existing infrastructure. Unix has a fairly well designed and simple file system, so you just put conffiles in /etc, just like everybody else does. Of course there's the odd misfit who doesn't play nice, instead scattering their crap around in /opt/vendor/package or /usr/package - those are then ridiculed in the Unix culture, rather than glorified.

Reply Parent Score: 2