To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Yes, and Aaron responded to his mail as well of course. Dan got exposed for his silly arguments and of course kept going and going. I guess he and Aaron should spend some time in a room to fight it out - he refuses to understand what it is all about. And as I said before, if a non-technical person like me can get that, and if there are already 3 entirely independent implementations of the standard, Dan's stubborn criticism can only be seen as dishonest.
Well, I'm a technical person and I disagree with your non-technical perspective.
So lets get technical. You can't write a specification to an implementation or write an implementation then call it a specification. A specification is a detailed unambiguous protocol. It's not an API. That's the crux of Dan's argument. And that argument is "technically" sound.
This is all software engineering jargon and I don't know your background. However, I'd refrain from making wild accusations on Dan's judgement given that some technical knowledge is needed to make any sensible remark on the issue.





Member since:
2005-06-29
And the response to that by Dan (a GNOME developer).
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xdg/2010-January/011238.html
Read it fully...