To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I'm afraid you're just trying to get this to dissipate via some silly divide and conquer type commentary probably by claiming that there is all some misunderstanding going on here. That's what usually happens.
The blog posts from various people, including those from a Gnome perspective are there as are the links to mailing list activity and people whove' gone through them. If you feel one side has been treated unfairly then do the research, redress the balance and post here. Until you do that you're not going to be successful in arguing anything.
I think that answers your query then. Was there any point?
Who's arguing? It's sad I'm getting a more balanced perspective from blogs than I am from osnews. For those who are interested in thoughtful GNOME perspective read the links below.
http://blogs.gnome.org/bolsh/2011/03/11/lessons-learned/
http://blog.fishsoup.net/2011/03/11/what-does-the-user-see/
I guess I expected too much from osnews.
Edited 2011-03-12 02:01 UTC





Member since:
2005-06-29
I'm a lot more interested in responses by developers involved in these discussions on the mailing lists, forums and bug reports.
Comments in blogs are usually opinionated noise.
Mark claims that libappindicator was proposed to GNOME and rejected. I can't find any entries for this in the gnome mailing list.
Aaron's discussion with the GNOME developers about the notification specification has already been posted somewhere in this thread. It's a far cry from GNOME developers being elitist. As a matter of fact, very real software engineering issues were raised.
However, I'm tired of all this. It's a waste of my time.