Linked by Brooss on Tue 15th Mar 2011 23:32 UTC
Benchmarks A comment on the recent article about the Bali release of Googles WebM tools (libvpx) claimed that one of the biggest problems facing the adoption of WebM video was the slow speed of the encoder as compared to x264. This article sets out to benchmark the encoder against x264 to see if this is indeed true and if so, how significant the speed difference really is.
Thread beginning with comment 466315
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Nice
by Brooss on Wed 16th Mar 2011 01:26 UTC in reply to "Nice"
Member since:

Yeah, getting good documentation on the encoder settings for vpxenc really is a bit of a problem.

240p video is very low resolution but its not unusual to see it on the web, youtube still offers it. It seemed like a reasonable starting point. I'd be interested to see how your higher resolution tests compare.

Reply Parent Score: 1