Linked by Brooss on Tue 15th Mar 2011 23:32 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 466346
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
The MSU test on the original release of VP8 found that it did much better on HD content than it did on SD/DVD content. I think they'd just spent more time tuning for that size.
I don't know if that has changed since, you'd think Google would have some interest in the lower resolutions used on Youtube, but on the other hand maybe every extra bit of quality on HD saves them more bandwidth than an extra bit of quality for a tiny video.




Member since:
2005-09-10
Remember that most users are not really home users in this case. WebM does well at low resolutions - the kind of resolutions you need for your mobile devices or youtube. Of course 320x240 is too small for that, 360p or 480p would be the most common use case for WebM.