Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 15th Mar 2011 18:17 UTC, submitted by gogothebee
Thread beginning with comment 466368
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
IMO, it is basically still the same operating system. I have seen it "grow" and it doesn't seem to be fundamentally different than when it was first released.
That will of course depend on what you are looking at. One could argue that windows 7 isn't fundamentally different from Vista. Or that the latest Ubuntu/Mac OS X/FreeBsd isn't fundamentally different from the ones you used 10 years ago.
XP might be many years old, but it didn't stop changing the day it was first shipped.
IMO, it is basically still the same operating system. I have seen it "grow" and it doesn't seem to be fundamentally different than when it was first released.
SP2 had quite a few updates in it, I would count that as just as large an upgrade as the typical 6 month linux update or an OSX version bump. I agree that SP3 shouldn't count, though.




Member since:
2005-07-06
You're not counting the service packs as anything more than bugfixes then. That's not how most people seem to think about them.
IMO, it is basically still the same operating system. I have seen it "grow" and it doesn't seem to be fundamentally different than when it was first released.
Some Linux distros have also something similar to "service packs", especially the Enterprise ones.
I don't believe anybody uses a Linux distro that long.