Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 14th Mar 2011 18:59 UTC
Talk, Rumors, X Versus Y And over the weekend, the saga regarding Canonical, GNOME, and KDE has continued. Lots of comments all over the web, some heated, some well-argued, some wholly indifferent. Most interestingly, Jeff Waugh and Dave Neary have elaborated on GNOME's position after the initial blog posts by Shuttleworth and Seigo, providing a more coherent look at GNOME's side of the story.
Thread beginning with comment 466505
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Ubuntu ?
by allanregistos on Thu 17th Mar 2011 09:02 UTC in reply to "Ubuntu ?"
Member since:

Mark Shuttleworth is a "show man", a blablabla man. And he seems to be, at least in my opnion a kind of dictator. Ubuntu is no democracy (it's widely known), so i think i've made my point.

Not defending Canonical or Ubuntu, you may have notice that Mark is the one funding the development of Ubuntu, this may change in the future depending on the success of the project. But you have to expect a different governing process of Ubuntu because of this, rather than expecting Ubuntu to behave like Debian. In that case, you may use Debian and avoid Ubuntu.

The founder may have weight on any decisions being made, but that should not hindered or compromise the ideals of free software. As of this moment, I think Mark doesn't violate any of this as far as FOSS is concerned. Developing in private and releasing it in public for acceptance as open source software is not in any violation of free software licenses available, I believe.

Reply Parent Score: 1