Linked by Amy Bennett on Wed 16th Mar 2011 22:31 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 466536
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Around here at least, this equivalence between mid-end and high-end is only true if you're ready to ditch ~40€/month in a phone contract.
For someone who can find good enough plans for ~20€/month, we're talking about saving 480 euros on the duration of a 24-month contract. That's quite a lot of money. In many situations, buying a phone with a contract based on the idea that it is cheaper *at purchase time* is deception. It's the same trick as bank credit : the numbers are smaller, but in the end you pay more.




Member since:
2006-07-14
Mid End : Something that costs the same as a smart phone but isn't as good (software or hardware wise). Primarily purchased by people on the basis of the colour of the phone, and the lack of understanding of the phones available.
It used to be different in Europe than the states and maybe it still is, but a phone that's 3G capable is required to be used with a monthly data plan, without any consideration of it being "mid end" or "high end". With various sales and what not, there really isn't a significant difference in price when bought on contract.
EDIT:
Some overall worse phones are still bought due to legacy compatibility reasons. There are enterprise blackberry apps, and just die hard users that still get them. Plus some still use Win mobile 6 devices for apps unavailable on other platforms. So its not completely trivial when people buy a worse phone for the same amount of money.
Edited 2011-03-17 15:34 UTC