Linked by Brooss on Tue 15th Mar 2011 23:32 UTC
Benchmarks A comment on the recent article about the Bali release of Googles WebM tools (libvpx) claimed that one of the biggest problems facing the adoption of WebM video was the slow speed of the encoder as compared to x264. This article sets out to benchmark the encoder against x264 to see if this is indeed true and if so, how significant the speed difference really is.
Thread beginning with comment 466565
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Sad...
by nt_jerkface on Thu 17th Mar 2011 20:18 UTC in reply to "RE[3]: Sad..."
nt_jerkface
Member since:
2009-08-26

You typically provide a bunch of redundant links that no one cares about.

When it comes to providing links less is more. It seems that half the time you are filling your posts with links to add gravitas but people would probably take them more seriously if you shortened them and got to the point.

Reply Parent Score: 2