Linked by Dedoimedo on Thu 17th Mar 2011 23:17 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 466597
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Comment by abstraction
by Flatland_Spider on Fri 18th Mar 2011 05:04
in reply to "Comment by abstraction"
RE: Comment by abstraction
by cmchittom on Fri 18th Mar 2011 13:27
in reply to "Comment by abstraction"
It's funny that you say that. After having used Red Hat, Mandrake, Debian, CRUX, Slackware, and Arch at various times over about eight or nine years, I switched to BSD precisely because of the documentation—which on the BSDs is actually kept up-to-date and accurate. I just got tired of the man pages being absent, outdated, flat-out inaccurate, or just pointers to the info pages (Dear GNU/FSF: nobody likes info pages, ok srsly?).
And online forums, while helpful, are not and cannot be a real substitute for having proper documentation in the first place.
RE: Comment by abstraction
by phoenix on Fri 18th Mar 2011 17:29
in reply to "Comment by abstraction"




Member since:
2008-11-27
Considering the state of other modern distributions it is now very clear how far behind Debian is in it's current state.
I'm using Arch where you basically need to configure everything manually. Even though it is more work initially it still seems like a better alternative to using Debian's installer. This is probably because Arch documentation is so damn good I don't need an installer to do things for me.