Linked by fran on Sun 20th Mar 2011 20:00 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 467077
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: "and it's available royalty free"
by Thom_Holwerda on Mon 21st Mar 2011 09:05
in reply to "RE[3]: "and it's available royalty free""
This is bad ... err, ummm, ... how exactly?
Apple fanboy logic:
If Apple (an advertising company also) has all your info through iTunes, MobileMe, App Store, and so on, and uses it for targeted advertising: okay.
If Google has all your info through its services and uses it for targeted advertising: bad.
RE[5]: "and it's available royalty free"
by testman on Mon 21st Mar 2011 11:48
in reply to "RE[4]: "and it's available royalty free""
RE[4]: "and it's available royalty free"
by testman on Mon 21st Mar 2011 11:18
in reply to "RE[3]: "and it's available royalty free""
RE[5]: "and it's available royalty free"
by Soulbender on Mon 21st Mar 2011 17:49
in reply to "RE[4]: "and it's available royalty free""




Member since:
2007-02-17
Which it is. Google essentially make their money via advertising revenue, which is raised when people view web pages. The more people who view more web pages more easily, more often and more freely, the more money Google stand to make.
Therefore, it is in Google's best interests to facilitate people being able to view web pages, without their having to pay any "toll" for viewing. It also helps Google's best interest if other people are ablle to offer web pages to the public for viewing, without having to pay any dubious technology toll.
Therefore, it is in Google's best interests to offer everybody a toll-free video codec.
This is bad ... err, ummm, ... how exactly?