To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Well, the electric cars are interesting but we just do not have the ability to produce enough energy to run them, even with nuclear power. We can afford to run some of them for PR purpose but we just can't put an electric car in the hand of even half the people who need transportation.
As for heating, in my opinion, the solution is isolation and low heat.
So, what do you think about the idea of dropping individual cars, having people travel with bikes and public transportation instead when possible, but keeping them for...
-Heavy loads (postal services, delivery, buses, professionals like plumbers who need to carry heavy tools around as part of their job)
-Events where speed is a critical issues (medical emergencies noticeably)
-People who technically can't use bikes and public transportation for some valid medical reason





Member since:
2007-04-25
Sorry, I'm commenting way to much (and way off topic), but...
"electric cars are a dead end"
Why is this? Electric cars can be directly powered by fully sustainable energy sources like wind, solar and geothermal. Sustainable hydrogen would be manufactured using electricity (most today comes from fossil fuels, of course) but at a significant efficiently loss, and the other alternatives of which I'm aware pollute rather badly.
"Electric heaters should be banned"
So you prefer wood-burning stoves or fossil fuels? Hibernating underground? Freezing all winter?
Sorry, just not following what you're suggesting here.
+1 on the telecommuting, though. I truly enjoy it!