Linked by Dedoimedo on Thu 17th Mar 2011 23:17 UTC
Debian and its clones Writing about Debian is not a simple thing. You know it's the giant that has spawned pretty much every other distro out there. It's almost like a Roman Empire, almost a taboo. Furthermore, it's not a desktop distro per se. It's more sort of a template you use to build your platform. It's also a SOHO server distro, therefore it more fits into the business category, comparable to CentOS and similar.
Thread beginning with comment 467367
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Member since:

Debian is a perfectly valid desktop distribution. I really don't get the "Debian is for servers only" claims either. Why should only one's servers benefit from Debian's focus on stability and security.

Personally, I'm a fork snob by nature too though. I just can't understand using a child fork based on a parent distribution when one can simply use the parent distribution. I used Mandriva only because Red Hat was inadiquate for my needs. I use Debian because there is no justification for me using a child fork based on it's beta and development versions.

Besides.. Dolphin is unstable enough at it's Debian Stable version. I'm going no where near a Beta or development version of it on a production machine I use daily.

Reply Parent Score: 2