Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 21st Mar 2011 23:00 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 467384
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: I'm by no means a apple fan boy but...
by WereCatf on Tue 22nd Mar 2011 20:24
in reply to "RE[4]: I'm by no means a apple fan boy but..."
Really? So that means I can create my own OS called, "Sabon's Windows" and Microsoft won't come after me because it doesn't say Microsoft in the name? Are you serious?
Of course they can _try_, but as the Microsoft vs. Linspire case taught us they couldn't enforce trademark on "windows" or very similar terms.




Member since:
2005-07-06
Microsoft has trademark for "Microsoft Windows", which is obviously unique enough to be trademarkable. Just plain "windows" is too generic a term to trademark. "
Using your logic, Microsoft should lose their trademark Windows then. I'm all for that.
Microsoft has trademark for "Microsoft Windows", which is obviously unique enough to be trademarkable. Just plain "windows" is too generic a term to trademark. [/q]
Really? So that means I can create my own OS called, "Sabon's Windows" and Microsoft won't come after me because it doesn't say Microsoft in the name? Are you serious?