Linked by David Adams on Mon 21st Mar 2011 20:14 UTC, submitted by Anonymous
Thread beginning with comment 467533
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-01-24
So did Microsoft's, Windows and Office aren't new products.
FSF themselves have stated that Hurd was all but abandoned once Linux gained traction, and Gnash is a clean room implementation done by extremely few developers, which will have even less priority now that the web seems to be gravitating towards HTML5.
So by your logic we should judge Microsoft by looking at Microsoft Bob and Zune, or maybe the Windows XP Tablet PC Edition, or the Microsoft Smart Watch, or the -insert failed Microsoft product here-
Meanwhile the FSF software flagships are as strong as ever, GCC and binutils/coreutils enjoys rapid development, and it's still the de facto toolchain in the open source world. The other flagship of FSF, GPL, is as popular as ever.
So if FSF is relying on old greatest hits, so is Microsoft.