Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 26th Mar 2011 02:00 UTC
Mac OS X When you run smbd -V on your Snow Leopard installation, you'll see it's running SAMBA version 3.0.28a-apple. While I'm not sure how much difference the "-apple" makes, version 3.0.28a is old. Very old. In other words, it's riddled with bugs. Apple hasn't updated SAMBA in 3 years, and for Lion, they're dumping it altogether for something homegrown. The reason? SAMBA is now GPLv3.
Thread beginning with comment 468111
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Comment by Brynet
by ichi on Mon 28th Mar 2011 07:59 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: Comment by Brynet"
ichi
Member since:
2007-03-06

Every other person does not give their work away, and certainly does not allow people to fix "bugs" after the fact. If a Dr. replaces my shoulder, I certainly am not going to fix any errors he made myself, I'm going to go to another Dr. Same with an architect, if an architect designs my building, i certainly am not going to fix any problems myself, I will get an architect or an engineer too.

Most other professions do not use the OSS or Free Software model, and never can, or will.


You don't fix problems yourself, but you get a detailed explanation along with radiographies/blueprints so you can get another doctor/architect/engineer to fix those problems.

I've yet to see any doctor/architect hiding information to their customers and/or forbidding them from hiring third parties to perform further modifications. It looks quite FOSS to me.

Reply Parent Score: 4

RE[4]: Comment by Brynet
by BluenoseJake on Mon 28th Mar 2011 12:34 in reply to "RE[3]: Comment by Brynet"
BluenoseJake Member since:
2005-08-11

You don't fix problems yourself, but you get a detailed explanation along with radiographies/blueprints so you can get another doctor/architect/engineer to fix those problems.

I've yet to see any doctor/architect hiding information to their customers and/or forbidding them from hiring third parties to perform further modifications. It looks quite FOSS to me.


Really? Just because they don't use lock-in? That's really not FOSS, that's just information about your body/building. On the other hand, the medical profession has patented genes(or at least tried), did unauthorized experiments on patients (google syphilis and the American south, or LSD trials on prisoners in the US).

Doesn't sound much like FOSS to me, when you don't have control over your own body.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[5]: Comment by Brynet
by ichi on Mon 28th Mar 2011 13:33 in reply to "RE[4]: Comment by Brynet"
ichi Member since:
2007-03-06

Really? Just because they don't use lock-in? That's really not FOSS, that's just information about your body/building. On the other hand, the medical profession has patented genes(or at least tried), did unauthorized experiments on patients (google syphilis and the American south, or LSD trials on prisoners in the US).

Doesn't sound much like FOSS to me, when you don't have control over your own body.


It's not just absence of lock-in, you get full information about what's been done, how and why, be it a surgical intervention or a drug treatment.

Drugs on medical treatments are diagnosed based on the active principle, and documentation on it's full composition and effects (and hence the reasoning behind the prescription) is publicly available.
You can request any other doctor to take on your illness at any point and continue from there, with full access to all your medical records and complete info about your previous treatment.

When it comes to architecture, you have access not only to the blueprints but also to a comprehensive list of the materials used.

I wouldn't consider subjects of unauthorized experiments to be actual "customers". If they were to be considered patients that would be a violation of the Hippocratic Oath, and as such a exception rather than the norm.

Reply Parent Score: 3