Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 3rd Apr 2011 11:06 UTC, submitted by Debjit

Thread beginning with comment 468818
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Usless on a modern 16:9 screen.
by Aankhen on Mon 4th Apr 2011 07:50
in reply to "Usless on a modern 16:9 screen."
Anything that uses up vertical resolution like this must be given the heave ho.
It might be ok on 4:3 screens but as everything seems to be going widescreen these days(16:9) then this has to be a NO-NO.
It might be ok on 4:3 screens but as everything seems to be going widescreen these days(16:9) then this has to be a NO-NO.
Most widescreen displays are 16:10. I have one, and I make use of it by having several long windows side-by-side rather than wide, vertically-stacked windows. I’d rather sacrifice some vertical space than some horizontal space. (Ideally, of course, I wouldn’t have to sacrifice any space at all. :-)
Edited 2011-04-04 07:53 UTC
Member since:
2005-07-22
Anything that uses up vertical resolution like this must be given the heave ho.
It might be ok on 4:3 screens but as everything seems to be going widescreen these days(16:9) then this has to be a NO-NO.
Do these guys at MS evey get out of their basements and into the real world? With all these toolbars and not a ribbon there soon won't be any room on the screen for actual data.
Oh silly me. Perhaps that is what they want all along?