Linked by David Adams on Mon 4th Apr 2011 02:19 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 468885
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: David Adams, you wasted an entry in OSnews
by vodoomoth on Mon 4th Apr 2011 11:15
in reply to "David Adams, you wasted an entry in OSnews"
Enderle might be what you describe. But for me, who didn't know the guy and thus can't cringe at reading his name, David's article was an interesting read. So no, I don't think he wasted an entry. In fact, before reading the comments, I clicked the "recommend this" button.
On the other hand, some user comments seem totally useless.
RE[2]: David Adams, you wasted an entry in OSnews
by tanishaj on Mon 4th Apr 2011 23:50
in reply to "RE: David Adams, you wasted an entry in OSnews"
RE: David Adams, you wasted an entry in OSnews
by jakesdad on Mon 4th Apr 2011 12:32
in reply to "David Adams, you wasted an entry in OSnews"
RE: David Adams, you wasted an entry in OSnews
by David on Mon 4th Apr 2011 21:19
in reply to "David Adams, you wasted an entry in OSnews"
I realize that Enderle has a bad reputation, and that's one of the reasons that I made sure to attribute the original article to him explicitly in the description, which we don't usually do. Nevertheless, I did find his analysis of the situation to be insightful, and where I doubted his claims, I pointed that out. (I'm not sure that Google is really starving the Android project for resources).





Member since:
2005-08-14
Enderle is not a newsworthy person, has nothing insightful to say, and rehashes badly what he hears around.
It is not worth to take up a news item on OSnews for Enderle.