Linked by David Adams on Mon 4th Apr 2011 02:19 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 468910
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: David Adams, you wasted an entry in OSnews
by tanishaj on Mon 4th Apr 2011 23:50
in reply to "RE: David Adams, you wasted an entry in OSnews"
RE[3]: David Adams, you wasted an entry in OSnews
by vodoomoth on Tue 5th Apr 2011 06:56
in reply to "RE[2]: David Adams, you wasted an entry in OSnews"
My point was: remove his name or, if you can, forget that it's him who wrote the article, and it would not look like misinformation or misdirection any longer.
In and of itself, what I read isn't misinformation and it isn't a piece of intentional deception. Even delusional liars sometimes tell the truth. It might be what happened here.
But yes, I understand your point; it's like Nintendo having each other year a new batch of people beguiled by an umpteenth rehash of a Mario, Donkey Kong or Zelda game.




Member since:
2010-03-30
Enderle might be what you describe. But for me, who didn't know the guy and thus can't cringe at reading his name, David's article was an interesting read. So no, I don't think he wasted an entry. In fact, before reading the comments, I clicked the "recommend this" button.
On the other hand, some user comments seem totally useless.