Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 4th Apr 2011 22:59 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 469020
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Not sure about this. Adobe Reader seems reasonably fast lately. I mean, I can remember absolutely dreading PDF reader, but newer versions seem okay.
It's not just speed but there is also bloat as well. I've just jumped over to Adobe.com to find out the size of Adobe Reader X (10.0.1) which weighs in at 66.44MB with the Windows version doing no batter either. I mean, this isn't an office suite or a photo editing application, its only a viewer, a viewer shouldn't be weighing in at 66MB nor should it be installing browser freezing plugins that do nothing to the experience other than to make things 100 times worse.
The only thing worse than Adobe Reader X (10.0.1) is probably the 300MB drivers that HP expect end users to download just to get their printers to work with Windows. I swear sometimes that these programmers who make said programmes don't live on the same planet as everyone does, I've yet to come across an Adobe employee on any forum who is openly proud about working for Adobe on a said product. Is Adobe quickly becoming one of those organisations where, when people leave after working there, they'd sooner say they were unemployed for 20 years than ever admit they worked for Adobe at some point?




Member since:
2011-03-29
Not sure about this. Adobe Reader seems reasonably fast lately. I mean, I can remember absolutely dreading PDF reader, but newer versions seem okay.
Edited 2011-04-05 00:59 UTC