To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I don't see morals on either side.
What does the price of anybody's condo have to do with this? Your comment suggests that since a Sony executive might or might not have an expensive condo it is morally just to cut off access to regular, innocent Playstation users. How do you know "Anonymous" don't have expensive condos? How many Sony executives or "Anonymous" do you know?
This is no Boston Tea Party or storming of the Bastille. This is just causing unknown collateral damage to innocent users who will temporarily not have access to playstation.com. This will only cause these innocent users to get mad at "Anonymous" and side with Sony. I don't agree with Sony's lawsuit AT ALL, but a smarter thing to do would be to create more access to the work that Sony hates so much. A denial of service attack on playstation.com is nothing more than a loud bark with no bite. Talking loud and then turning the other way. It doesn't take a genius to flood the internets. I actually see it as being lazy and empty of any good ideas.





Member since:
2009-12-25
I believe these actions are a symptom of a small group of nerds living in their mother's basements!