Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 4th Apr 2011 22:59 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 469088
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[8]: Comment by Stratoukos
by lemur2 on Tue 5th Apr 2011 11:23
in reply to "RE[7]: Comment by Stratoukos"
Businesses may use msoffice, but they use several different versions and compatibility between them can be quite poor for all but the simplest of documents... Someone using openoffice often doesn't even get noticed.
But yes, PDF is the only sensible format if you want to preserve your formatting, and osx/linux actually include far better out of the box support for pdf than anything microsoft has.
But yes, PDF is the only sensible format if you want to preserve your formatting, and osx/linux actually include far better out of the box support for pdf than anything microsoft has.
ODF is also a perfectly sensible format for compatibility between different programs operating on either the same, or different platforms.
The new LibreOffice, for example, is available for a number of desktop systems:
http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/system-requirements/
and it has excellent interoperability with other Office suites, including MS Office, MS Works and Wordperfect for example.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LibreOffice#Supported_formats
http://www.excitingip.com/1342/why-you-should-implement-libre-offic...
The only Office program in common use that is hopeless at ODF interoperability is MS Office, anything else is fine. Fortunately, there is no reason at all why anyone cannot simply install Libre Office as well as (whatever version) of MS Office on the same machine. If a given machine has an older version of MS Office, installing LibreOffice alongside it would be a significant upgrade for zero cost.
RE[9]: Comment by Stratoukos
by Thom_Holwerda on Tue 5th Apr 2011 11:27
in reply to "RE[8]: Comment by Stratoukos"
Except, of course, that OpenOffice is one of the most horrible programs ever devised by man, and ever since Office 2007, the gap has only widened. Recommending OpenOffice as a valid alternative to the polished and remarkably speedy Office 2007 or 2010 is incredibly disingenuous.
Not only does OpenOffice have a horrid interface, its .doc compatibility is downright abysmal While that surely is through no fault of their own, it is a fact of life that people have to deal with. In a professional environment, where documents are (sadly) passed around in .doc format, OOo has no place whatsoever.
RE[8]: Comment by Stratoukos
by lucas_maximus on Tue 5th Apr 2011 12:05
in reply to "RE[7]: Comment by Stratoukos"





Member since:
2007-04-23
Businesses may use msoffice, but they use several different versions and compatibility between them can be quite poor for all but the simplest of documents... Someone using openoffice often doesn't even get noticed.
But yes, PDF is the only sensible format if you want to preserve your formatting, and osx/linux actually include far better out of the box support for pdf than anything microsoft has.