Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 5th Apr 2011 22:48 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 469212
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Isn't this all because Google wants to prevent fragmentation by keeping the source slightly closed ?
Interresting enough it is the device builders/telecom providers which want to differentiate.
Interresting enough it is the device builders/telecom providers which want to differentiate.
I don't think it's fragmentation/differentiation, so much as the quality of products being associated with the Android brand - not dissimilar to Apple's attitude towards running MacOS on non-Apple hardware.
For the time being, it looks like Google's approach is to limit who they supply the newer versions of Android to, so that each product released with 3.0 is a tested and supported configuration. So for better or worse, no more cheap Android tablets from obscure manufacturers that even Google hasn't heard of...
You are confusing quality and price. High price does not automatically imply high quality.
Just take a look at Motorola XOOM: high price, low quality. If google wants android to be associated with high quality, why the hell did they release XOOM so early?
disclaimer: I run honeycomb on a high quality/low cost tablet thanks to XDA.




Member since:
2007-09-22
Isn't this all because Google wants to prevent fragmentation by keeping the source slightly closed ?
Interresting enough it is the device builders/telecom providers which want to differentiate.
Maybe someone should define very clearly which parts are part of the 'platform' and need to be kept compatible. And which can be customized to their hearts content.