Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 6th Apr 2011 17:50 UTC, submitted by Cytor
Thread beginning with comment 469510
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Alternative other than KDE
by kiddo on Thu 7th Apr 2011 15:13
in reply to "RE: Alternative other than KDE"
Bleh, can't correct my previous comment since I posted it >20 minutes ago.
My "180 MB of RAM" figure was actually quite pessimistic. It actually uses less than 120 MB: http://jeff.ecchi.ca/blog/2011/04/07/gnome-3-0s-ram-usage/




Member since:
2005-07-23
What is interesting is that I have been testing GNOME Shell on Fedora 15 (to be released in May), on a machine with only 512 MB of RAM.
I have no idea where those people get the "it uses 600 MB of RAM" figure.
On my machine (without any tweaks whatsoever), GNOME3 with GNOME Shell uses less than 180 MB of RAM on startup. I don't even touch the swap file. And you know what? This RAM usage is the same as GNOME 2.x!