To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Do you just make stuff up and assume everyone does the same?
Indeed, the US market - which grew an impressive 41% year on year - is currently the largest smartphone market in the world, with 14.7 million units accounting for 23% of total global shipments in Q2 2010.
http://www.tgdaily.com/mobility-features/50907-android-smartphone-s...
Depends on how you define your markets. For example, while individual countries in Europe (or Asia) may not constitute bigger markets the region as whole may do.
Depends on what argument you're trying to make. A common argument seems to be that Linux on the desktop is a failure due to small market share.
23% of the global market negates his statement by any definition.
It failed at mainstream success. It's always had success as a hobbyist system.
Well, windows mobile certainly was not a success on the scale of the iphone, android,blackberry, or symbian. I can't imagine Microsoft's goal with their smart-phones was to be bad enough to be dropped when presented with a choice of a phone with any other operating system. So, yeah I'd consider it to be a failure.
It would be interesting to see some inside numbers on the profitability of the phone OS from 2002 to today. I can't imagine it was very profitable. It also didn't appear to give them any kind of head start in the smart phone market. It really does look like a wasted effort.





Member since:
2009-08-26
The US is the largest smartphone market. I'm not sure how you would view it as "very small" in any context.
Since when does having a small market share equate failure?