Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 14th Apr 2011 21:41 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 470150
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: "imposed upon ISPs by courts"
by mrhasbean on Thu 14th Apr 2011 23:24
in reply to "RE: "imposed upon ISPs by courts""
Since those would be outside of Europe the European Court of Justice have no jurisdiction there.
Wow, who'd have thought What it would do is add credence to the arguments by those opposing the filters / have them dismantled in countries where they've been legislated. And if they don't outlaw them in Europe you can bet it won't be long before they're imposed.
RE[3]: "imposed upon ISPs by courts"
by Soulbender on Fri 15th Apr 2011 04:29
in reply to "RE[2]: "imposed upon ISPs by courts""
Europe can't outlaw filtering in countries outside europe, obviously, so what would be the point? We cant make laws for other countries and saying "we have decided that doing what you're doing in your country is unlawful". It's like, say, Sweden would decide to outlaw filtering in the U.S. It's pointless and arrogant.
As I understand it this new "directive" (or whatever) would also apply to government forced filtering.
Now, officially condemning something that is happening somewhere else is an entirely different matter.





Member since:
2005-08-18
Since those would be outside of Europe the European Court of Justice have no jurisdiction there.