Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 16th Apr 2011 08:30 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 470292
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Shareholders likely wouldn't tolerate a billion plus being spent on patents Apple doesn't need. Apple is not in the business of licensing their IP, and they already have a homegrown defensive patent portfolio. At the end of the day it would be far cheaper just to license essential tech from the other patent holders like Nokia or Motorola. Apple's biggest exposure is the risk from patent trolls, and these wouldn't protect against that.
Google, on the other hand, doesn't really have a significant patent pool to use defensively or otherwise. These patents would at least give them a bit of leverage with the other mobile heavyweights that could be used to defend their Android partners or for cross-licensing. RIM is in a similar position.
RE[2]: My Idiotic comment
by Soulbender on Sun 17th Apr 2011 02:53
in reply to "RE: My Idiotic comment"




Member since:
2008-05-15
This may sound idiotic but can't Apple just outbid Google and RIM?, They have the cash, and that would look like: Hey! I am the bulliest bully in the town.