Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 18th Apr 2011 21:29 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 470624
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Not ALL patents and EVERY copyright are evil
by ndrw on Wed 20th Apr 2011 03:22
in reply to "RE: Not ALL patents and EVERY copyright are evil"
And about hardware/software patent thing.
In my opinion all patents are bad. Just some are worse than others.
Hardware patents don't suck as much as software ones, because:
a) Many of them already expired (in public domain), and the development rate is slower (it's a real world dealing with real stuff, not just information). This is just a matter of the scale of the problem.
b) You're not at the risk unless you produce hardware in volume, which excludes hobbyists and small companies. Contrast that with software, which can be written by anyone and distributed in any numbers.




Member since:
2009-06-30
There was never any real need for patent or copyright systems. They were invented after the fact, purely for protecting the interest of large manufacturers or publishers at the time.
Patents or copyright do only one thing - they suppress the competition. And lack of competition is never good for consumers, period. Saying that companies wouldn't have incentives for innovation? They had better innovate like crazy unless they wanted to go bust.
The point is, the world without patents or copyright would develop just fine, probably better than now. Just look at the fashion industry, where there is still very little regulation (although French and Italians are trying to change it) - you can't say it suffers from the lack of innovation or that it is not profitable, can you?