Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 25th Apr 2011 22:15 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 471083
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Not necessary for an e-reader
by bornagainenguin on Thu 28th Apr 2011 03:47
in reply to "RE[2]: Not necessary for an e-reader"
leos pondered...
I don't see the attraction of the nook. It's an inferior tablet compared to the iPad or Xoom, and it's an inferior book reading device compared to the Kindle. It does a bit of everything, but I wouldn't be satisfied with either.
Simple: It does those bits of everything for cheap.
Does that help explain things for you?
--bornagainpenguin
RE[3]: Not necessary for an e-reader
by eric_niebler on Thu 28th Apr 2011 06:00
in reply to "RE[2]: Not necessary for an e-reader"




Member since:
2005-09-21
and without paying anything extra, you can ALSO do lots of other things IF YOU CHOOSE to do so
I don't see it like that at all. The nook color is a budget tablet, which is fine if that's what you want. The kindle is an actual ebook reader. A device with an LCD screen is not in the same league as a device with a proper sunlight-readable screen. Sure you can read a book on an LCD screen, but that's no better than a laptop. I don't see the attraction of the nook. It's an inferior tablet compared to the iPad or Xoom, and it's an inferior book reading device compared to the Kindle. It does a bit of everything, but I wouldn't be satisfied with either.