Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 26th Apr 2011 11:48 UTC, submitted by Elv13
Thread beginning with comment 471149
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Two questions about this...
by Lennie on Wed 27th Apr 2011 10:46
in reply to "RE: Two questions about this..."
Here is a video which details where VP3 came from, which was donated to the xiph.org and what Ogg Theora is now based on. So I think atleast VP3 should be ok, they obviously added a lot of stuff before they got to VP8.
It also explains a lot of the issues about software patents in this part of the industry.
http://air.mozilla.com/open-video-codec-discussion-at-mozilla/
Edited 2011-04-27 10:46 UTC




Member since:
2005-09-08
1. There are patents on VP8, Google bought the codec with the patents
2. It predates H264, making it prior art anything MPEG LA might throw at it, and making it equally likely that the VP8 patents apply to H264 as the reverse.
3. Software patents in themselves doesn't make any sense. But if you accept their existence, you need to do is go search for things that doesn't make sense and collect them in pools (apparently).