To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Does not work. If your microwave make competitor make a microwave that cook faster every 2 week, you will replace your own with a faster one. Same goes for the power, you wont use you cooking oven to eat up popcorn. It's just too much for absolutely no benefits, not even power/cost.
The microwave analogy is flawed, I think.
No one needs a microwave which heats things up slightly faster than existing ones. You wouldn't sell it before it starts to heat things up at least an order of magnitude faster (yay, 6 seconds heat-up times !). Nowadays, people are more likely to choose a microwave based on design or usability criteria, since from a performance point of view they're all more or less the same.
However, IIRC again, the difference in power/performance ratio between an Atom chip and an ARM chip is less than an order of magnitude, but it's quite a big deal already because reducing the battery life of a mobile device by a factor of 2 or 3 without benefits in another area is already something pretty much unacceptable unless you can come up with genius marketing to justify that.
Edited 2011-05-05 06:27 UTC




Member since:
2005-07-13
"I think, AMD will start manufacturing ARM processors or otherwise they should come up with less than 22nm transitors to survive."

I wouldn't say that. They don't need to compete in that space, though it would likely be in their best interest.
Example: I have a microwave. The company that makes it has not made a portable hand held microwave and yet they are still surviving. (it's not a great direct comparison, as the market isn't heading towards "hand help microwaves" but still).
AMD will adapt, they always do