Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 4th May 2011 20:41 UTC, submitted by lemur2
Thread beginning with comment 471946
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/20/13 6:17 UTC, submitted by MOS6510
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 23:02 UTC, submitted by M.Onty
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 22:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-02-17
Au contraire, Qt has bindings for: C, C++, D, Python, Ruby, Java, Pascal, Perl, PHP, QML, Tcl, Haskell, Lisp, R, Ada and Lua.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qt_%28framework%29#Bindings
Qt is cross-platform, is licesnsed under LGPL so it has a linking exception, and it has a powerful development environment.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qt_%28framework%29#Tools
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qt_Creator
Even though it does support C#, AFAIK there are very few programs written in Qt/C#, probably because the plethora of other options are better.
If one wants to write a cross-platform application these days, using Qt is by far the best option.
Enjoy.
Using .NET will constrict your application to just the Windows market.
Edited 2011-05-05 23:15 UTC