Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 5th May 2011 21:07 UTC, submitted by sawboss
Thread beginning with comment 472066
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-09-02
I am not ignorant of that; however, there is a difference between being assaulted and actively invoking it on yourself. The sentence in question brought an example of how stupid Sony's behavior would look like in another context.
We must accept that there are criminals on the internet, and it is dangerous not to protect yourself somehow, even if you are a regular user, in the same way as most cities have areas you should avoid at night. Disregarding this fact will only make a random user careless; but for a trillion-dollar enterprise, it is actively asking for trouble. Hence the analogy. Yes, this is the case where Sony was asking for it.