To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Linux isn't just the kernel. glibc has different development team than the kernel has. And some distribution started using eglibc.
coreutils have once again, a different bunch of developers.
The worst thing is, the distributions themself make very little changes to the code. e.g. they don't delete code they don't need.
There is no one who has a final say on things. You could argue that would be the package maintainers. But they tend to be really bad at understanding/reading/writing the code.
Right, linux IS just the kernel. Then that makes this entire article and debate pointless and stupid, since the author tried comparing two "operating systems". Then again, linux and the BSD kernels are all open source. The "official" kernel doesn't have to be used, and Debian is proving you can have a GNU userland with a BSD kernel. So then I'm brought back in a full circle to say it's not the license. It's advertising and exposure.




Member since:
2005-08-18
Linux is not a democracy. Linux has the ultimate say on what goes in the official kernel or not.