
When comparing the evolution in market share of Linux and OpenBSD, two operating systems that were born around the same time, a question comes to mind:
why is there such a difference in market penetration? Linux, on one side of the spectrum, with a license that supposedly impairs commercial venues, has enticed companies and organizations to adopt and support it under varying commercial models, while the BSD derivatives (FreeBSD, OpenBSD and NetBSD), with a larger history and an allegedly more commercial friendly license haven't been as successful to gather a large installed base and widespread adoption.
Member since:
2011-05-07
The question was raised 5 years ago and David Wheeler gave a really good answer that made me rethink the BSD/GPL license problem:
http://www.dwheeler.com/blog/2006/09/01/#gpl-bsd
Edited 2011-05-07 08:49 UTC