Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 6th May 2011 21:00 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 472165
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: ____________ (Insert applause here)
by GatoLoko on Sat 7th May 2011 16:25
in reply to "RE[3]: ____________ (Insert applause here)"
Keep in mind that out of the box, PostgreSQL is configured very conservatively, using extremely "safe" defaults. It's possible to greatly improve the performance by tuning it.
As I said, it was running an "optimized" config, or at least an attempt to it. Don't know how well tuned it is.
RE[5]: ____________ (Insert applause here)
by Lennie on Mon 9th May 2011 16:00
in reply to "RE[4]: ____________ (Insert applause here)"




Member since:
2007-03-07
Keep in mind that out of the box, PostgreSQL is configured very conservatively, using extremely "safe" defaults. It's possible to greatly improve the performance by tuning it.