Linked by fvillanustre on Fri 6th May 2011 22:19 UTC
Talk, Rumors, X Versus Y When comparing the evolution in market share of Linux and OpenBSD, two operating systems that were born around the same time, a question comes to mind: why is there such a difference in market penetration? Linux, on one side of the spectrum, with a license that supposedly impairs commercial venues, has enticed companies and organizations to adopt and support it under varying commercial models, while the BSD derivatives (FreeBSD, OpenBSD and NetBSD), with a larger history and an allegedly more commercial friendly license haven't been as successful to gather a large installed base and widespread adoption.
Thread beginning with comment 472197
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Main reason
by JAlexoid on Sat 7th May 2011 23:31 UTC in reply to "RE: Main reason"
Member since:

OpenBSD being used in a Fortune 500 company.

And Linux is used in most Fortune 500 companies. What's your point?

Reply Parent Score: 4

RE[3]: Main reason
by lucas_maximus on Sun 8th May 2011 14:23 in reply to "RE[2]: Main reason"
lucas_maximus Member since:

He was saying that it is only used for Security Nuts. The same people would probably only claim that OpenBSD is only good for servers and firewalls.

I gave a case study where it is being used by people who aren't hardcore UNIX security nuts and being used everywhere i.e. in a Fortune 500 company.

Therefore the point was ... wait for it mate ... that what he claimed simply isn't the case.

Edited 2011-05-08 14:29 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[4]: Main reason
by JAlexoid on Sun 8th May 2011 15:12 in reply to "RE[3]: Main reason"
JAlexoid Member since:

Ahhh.... Yeah.... The biggest security nuts I've ever seen in my life are heads of security in those Fortune 500 companies :-D

Reply Parent Score: 2